Jarvis: A Proactive Speech Agent for Multi-Party Conversations

Seunghyun Oh1*,  Hirotaka Hiraki2*,  Shuyue Stella Li1

Yulia Tsvetkov1,  Shyamnath Gollakota1

1 Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington    2 Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information Studies, The University of Tokyo

* Both authors contributed equally to this research.

arXiv preprint, 2026


[Paper] [Code (TBD)] [Dataset (TBD)]

Speech agents are reactive and dyadic: they speak when spoken to, and to one person at a time. We ask what it takes for a speech agent to instead take part in a conversation among several people and speak up only when it can help. We introduce Jarvis, a real-time proactive speech agent that audibly participates in multi-party human conversations. Grounded in a document shared beforehand, Jarvis follows the discussion and intervenes when the group misses or misstates a fact and does not correct itself within a few turns. We make three contributions: a problem setting based on epistemic breakdowns that makes proactive intervention measurable, realized as CHI-180-proactive, a synthetic multi-party dataset seeded with known gaps, errors, and self-corrections; a proactive backbone that harnesses a small, open-weight model with deterministic checks and grounds every claim in a source sentence; and interaction techniques for taking the floor in live speech and showing the cited evidence on screen. On CHI-180-proactive, Jarvis is correct on most events it addresses and stays silent 97% of the time when the group resolves an issue itself. A live study with 23 participants confirms these trends with real-time interventions.


Figure 1: Jarvis in a live multi-party Zoom meeting. (A) Jarvis joins as a participant and follows a shared document. (B) It corrects an unresolved misstated fact and cites the page. (C) It stays silent when the group corrects the error first.

Jarvis in a live multi-party meeting. (A) Jarvis joins the meeting as a participant, follows the conversation against a shared document, and can answer direct questions. For proactive intervention, it has two modes: 1) raises its hand to seek permission or 2) waits until no participant holds the floor and speaks directly. (B) If a document-grounded missing or misstated fact remains unresolved, Jarvis speaks to correct it and cites the relevant page. (C) If the group corrects the error first, Jarvis remains silent.